By A. Hyatt Verrill
From Travel magazine 1929 September.
Digitized by Doug Frizzle , October
2013.
This story was just located and acquired.
It is an interesting contrast with anothe r
article from later, 1932, entitled ‘The
Oldest City in the World’ and the se
images are much superior and probably taken by the
author./drf
TO me—and I have found that othe rs feel much the
same—Lake Titicaca gives the
impression of great age. Voyaging across this great lake on the roof of the
world, one seems to be navigating waters that belong to a dead world, that hold
the secrets of the ages in the ir
impenetrable depths. And even the
fact that one is traveling on a luxurious modern steamer, a miniature liner,
does not dispel this sensation. Neithe r
is it far from being the truth. On every side are the
bare brown hills with scarcely a trace of vegetation; in the
distance tower the endless
snow-capped Andean peaks. Everywhere the
steep shore slopes are covered with ancient Incan walls, with abandoned
terraced plots reaching from the water's edge to the
topmost summits of the hills. Ruins
of great temples and palaces rear the ir
massive walls here and the re, but all
seems deserted, dead, for the low
stone or mud huts of the living Indians
are scarcely discernible and rarely does one catch a glimpse of a human being.
And beneath the waters lie countless
relics of bygone races, of forgotten civilizations—idols and images and unknown,
incalculable treasures in silver and gold and precious stones—the offerings to the
mysterious gods of the lake, cast into
its depths for countless years, countless centuries, by ancient people—by the
pre-Incans and the Incans—who looked
upon the lake as sacred. Ancient,
too, is that mysterious spot, the
Island of the Sun, whence, according
to Incan allegory, came Manco Capac, the
first Inca, with his sister-wife, Mama Oello, and who, so Incan mythology
avers, were born of the sun and the lake.
Even Guáyqui, the tiny port on the
Bolivian side of Lake Titicaca , looks very old
(although as a matter of fact it is quite modern) despite the presence of railway tracks, locom otives, motor-boats and autom obiles.
The low adobe houses seem almost a part of the
surrounding red-brown plain. The Indians' reed boats, or balsas, with the ir matting sails are the
same as those of a thousand years ago, and the
Indians the mselves, in the ir bright-colored ponchos, the ir
sandals, the ir gaudy manias and
the ir voluminous brilliant skirts,
might well have stepped out of the
distant past.
Hence it seems quite fitting
that, near at hand barely twelve miles from
the port, the re
should be the oldest city in America . This
city was old at the time of the fall of Rom e —perhaps before the fall of Babylon .
For all we know it was thriving and populous in the
time of Moses, and in many ways it is the
most mysterious, puzzling city in the
entire world. Here at Tiahuanaco was the
center of a civilization unlike any othe r;
a civilization that rose to great heights in art, in engineering, in industries
and in religion, so far back in the
dim past that no tradition, no legend, no myth of its origin or its people
remains, but which left its influence upon countless othe r
cultures and civilizations over an area of hundreds of thousands of square
miles of South America.
Everything connected with Tiahuanaco seems to be mysterious and inexplicable. Even the site of the
city is most unusual. It stands upon an almost level plain in a far from fertile area, with no available water near it,
and almost midway between the two
ranges of hills that provide the
only stone in the vicinity that is
suitable for buildings. Yet within a dozen miles is the
vast, navigable lake abundant water, arable land and easy transportation. Many
authorities have claimed that, when the
city was built and occupied, it stood upon the
borders of the lake and that during the countless centuries that have passed, the waters have receded.
In support of this the ory the y
point to the remains of what the y claim were docks and quays. But the re is no valid geological evidence that the lake has receded appreciably for hundreds of
thousands of years, and careful observations made by the
engineers of the Guayqui-La Paz
Railway extending over a number of years prove conclusively that, at the present time, the
mean level remains almost constant and that, if anything, the lake's level is rising rathe r
than falling. Finally, the so-called
quays might just as well have been structures erected for som e entirely different purpose. Moreover, the re is nothing in the
sculptures, pottery, decorations or othe r
features of the remains to indicate
that the Tiahuanacans were a
lake-faring race.
Hence the
mystery remains as to why this great city was built in such a spot, and even
greater is the mystery of its
downfall, its abandonment. Who were the se
people, where did the y com e from ,
why did this marvelous civilization spring up, develop and vanish in this one
spot in an almost desert land in the
heart of the Andes?
At the
time of the Spanish Conquest, Tiahuanaco was a far more imposing city than today. At
that time many if not all of its gigantic buildings were standing, its
magnificent temples and marvelous palaces were nearly intact; its titanic
statues were in place. But nothing, not even the
imposing wonderful city, escaped the
Spaniards' greed. And what the
treasure-hunting Dons did not destroy the
fanatical Padres did. To the m it was
a holy duty to destroy everything that savored of Paganism, and the wonder is that any idol, sculpture or image
remained after the ir zealous crusade.
Possibly the y grew weary of
destroying stone images, and it must have seemed a rathe r
hopeless task, or perhaps the y had
neithe r the
time nor the money to com plete the
job. And it did cost both time and money. It is recorded that at one
spot, near Willcas Huaman, the
Spaniards found an image, carved from
a single block of stone, that measured nearly sixty feet in length by fourteen
feet in diameter. To destroy this titanic statue required the united labor of thirty men working steadily for
three days! Whethe r such stupendous
images ever existed at Tiahuanaco no one knows, but even today several immense monolithic statues remain
standing, chipped, scarred, defaced by vandals and by the
rifle fire of Bolivian soldiers, but still gazing calmly across the plain towards the
rising sun as the y did thousands of
years ago when Tiahuanaco was in its prime.
Even the name of the city has been a matter of mystery and has caused
much discussion. Its origin has been explained in various ways, the com monest
and most widely accepted being that an Inca, who was staying at the spot, was brought an urgent message by a runner.
In com pliment to his fleetness of
foot, the Inca com pared him to a Guanaco, and bade him be seated,
using the words "Sien te
Guanáca" This, however, is a far-fetched and highly improbable
explanation. In the first place, the words are a hodge-podge of Spanish and Indian,
and no Inca would have used Spanish when addressing one of his own race. In the second place, the
Guanaco is not a native of Peru
or Bolivia but of Chile and the Argentine, and an Incan, wishing to praise a
fleet-footed courier, would be far more likely to com pare
him with a Vicuna, an even faster creature. Finally, the
word Guanaco is not identical with Huánaco. As is so often the case, those striving to explain the name of the
city have overlooked the real and
simplest solution. In the ancient
Quichua or Hualla dialect, "Huánacu" means "dead," and
Tiahuánaco would signify a place of the
dead or a dead city. The use of the
word Huánacu or its derivatives or root, as applied to anything devoid of life
or associated with dead persons, was very prevalent among the Incans. Thus the
statues of the Incas in the Temple of the Sun at Cuzco
were known as the "Chuqui-huáncas,"
the burial ground was called
"Huánacu-Pampa," etc. So we may be quite certain that the name Tiahuánaco or "the
city of the dead" was bestowed
upon the ruins by the Huallas or Incans who knew the place only as a deserted, forgotten city of an
ancient vanished race.
Originally Tiahuanaco
must have presented a most imposing appearance. Though doubtless the houses of the
com mon people were of adobe and
thatch, and have long ages ago vanished, yet the
great public and ceremonial edifices were of almost incredible dimensions. As the ruins are today the y
may be roughly divided into three sections, known as the
Akapana, or Fortress, the Kalasasaya,
or Temple
and the Tunca-Puncu, or place
of Ten Doors. But originally, the
entire area between and about the se
three principal groups of ruins was covered with structures, idols, immense
stone monoliths, and othe r works of the se people, who, judging by the
remains the y have left, might well
have been supermen, giants who would have made Goliath puny by com parison. Just how the
city may have appeared, even at the
time of the Incas, no one can
positively state.
Through the ages that had the n
passed since Tiahuanaco had becom e a veritable "Place of the Dead" and, through the
centuries that have passed since the
days of Incan dom inion, this most
ancient American city has been desecrated, looted, literally torn to bits.
Choice portions of its magnificent sculptured stone work have been carried off
by the natives and used to build the ir own miserable huts, and the re
is scarcely an Indian dwelling within miles of the
ruins that does not possess a doorstep, a lintel, or som e
portion of its walls formed of fragments of Tiahuanaco .
Even the rough, narrow, filthy
streets of the villages are, in
places, roughly paved with pieces of carved or worked stone filched from the
ruins. The little Spanish church at the
modern village of Tiahuanaco is almost entirely constructed of portions
of the ancient town, and, flanking the entrance are the
heads and shoulders of two colossal stone images that were ruthlessly knocked
from the
bodies of Tiahuanaco 's stone gods. The Indian
farmers have surrounded the ir stony,
thin-soiled fields with walls constructed of stonework from
the ruins, and vandals, collectors
and curio seekers have done the ir
part. But the greatest damage of
all, the most ruthless and
inexcusable destruction, was caused by the
railway whose tracks run directly through the
center of the ancient city.
Thousands of tons of stone, idols, statues, monoliths, carved columns,
magnificent doorways, immense slabs and priceless sculptures were broken up,
crushed and used for ballasting the
tracks.
As a result of all this, the ruins today are in pitiable shape, and at first
glance seem scarcely more than meaningless piles of hand-worked stone. But even
so the ir immensity, the ir perfection and the
classic beauty of the ir sculptures
cannot fail to arouse the wonder and
the admiration of even the most indifferent observer. And as one examines the m more closely and becom es
accustom ed to the
surroundings, one can, in a measure, reconstruct Tiahuanaco in one's mind, and
can—inadequately—visualize the
buildings as the y were in the long ago when the
Condor-God was worshiped in the
great temple.
Parts of the ruins may be viewed from
the railway, and several of the great stone columns and images are within a few
yards of the tracks. But to see the best of the
ruins, to obtain any idea of the ir
extent and the ir titanic
proportions, one must walk about amid the
remains.
Nearest to the railway, and most prom inent
of all, is the so-called fortress or
Akapana, a pyramidal hill of artificial origin that rises to nearly two
hundred feet above the fairly level
plain. It is accurately placed so that its four sides are in line with the cardinal points of the
com pass, and at the base measures about seven hundred by five
hundred feet. Originally, no doubt, its sides were com pletely
faced with cut stone, like the
pyramids of the Mayas and the Teocalli of the
Aztecs. But few of the se blocks
remain, the greater portion having
been broken up for use on the railway.
Once, too, a magnificent stone stairway led to the
summit of the hill where the re was an immense basin, apparently for holding
water, and, from this, a conduit or
pipe line of beautifully cut stone troughs led down the
pyramid. Why the ancient Tiahuánacans
should have devoted such an immense amount of labor and time to erecting this
great mound merely to place a basin at its summit, or why, once the y had done so, the y
should have installed a drain, are unsolved mysteries. Assuredly it had som e very important and definite purpose. Possibly it
was a sort of reservoir to be drawn upon in time of drought or necessity; but
in that case the question of how water
was conveyed to the summit is as
great a mystery as the pyramid
itself. Unless the climate of the district has vastly changed, the rain alone could never have been counted upon to
keep the huge cistern filled, but
possibly thousands of toiling human beings may have carried water up the steep stairway by hand. At any rate, whethe r it was a reservoir, a fort, the site of a temple or the
residence of the Tiahuánacan
monarch, today it is scarcely more than a stone-littered hill, and the casual passerby would never give it a second
glance or dream it was raised by the
hands of men.
About one thousand feet from the
base of this former pyramid is the
so-called Temple
of the Sun, or Kalasasaya, perhaps
the best preserved of the ruins. Here is an immense rectangular terrace
nearly five hundred feet square with its edges outlined by rows of cut stone
columns from fifteen to twenty feet
in height. Originally the entire
area within the boundaries of the se columns was paved with carefully cut and
fitted stones, but between the
natives and the railway builders,
who found the se paving blocks most
useful for the ir purposes, scarcely
a trace of the ancient pavement now
remains. Originally, also, the
upright columns were connected or capped by timbers or othe r
stones, for the tops are carefully
and accurately mortised, evidently with the
purpose of supporting lintels. At a short distance from
the ruins, and facing the east, is a solitary huge stone image, its face
marred and scarred by vandals and time, but still gazing with an enigmatical
smile towards the rising sun, though
it alone remains of all the hundreds
of similar statues that once flanked the
temple. Access to the Kalasasaya is
now easy from any side, but in the days when it was in use the
only entrance was by way of a flight of great stone steps on the eastern side. Each step is a single slab of cut
stone nearly twenty feet in length by ten feet in width and over three feet in
thickness, and the whole is flanked
by two huge, sculptured stone monoliths.
But by far the most interesting object in the temple, in fact the
most interesting and remarkable object in the
entire city, is the Gateway of the Sun, as it is called, and which, in all
probability, served as the portal to
an inner temple in Tiahuánacan days. This magnificent piece of sculpture
measures nearly fifteen feet in length by eleven feet in height and two feet in
thickness and is pierced by a rectangular doorway nearly five feet in height
and over two feet in width. It is cut entire from
a single block of andesite rock—the
largest single piece of stone sculpture in the
world. But remarkable as it is for size, and as an example of the ancient stone cutters' skill, one scarcely notices
this in view of the far more
remarkable sculptures that cover it. Upon one side, the
upper portion above the doorway, it
is com pletely covered with a
beautifully-carved facade in low relief. Although no one can decipher the carving, yet it unquestionably had a very real
significance to the inhabitants of
Tiahuánaco, and its motif is easily recognized. The largest and central figure
is that of the Tiahuánacan supreme god,
com monly known as a sun-god. In all
probability, however, it was more in the
nature of the Pre-Incan Pachacamac
or the Condor-god, creator
of the universe, maker of the lake and "He who Upheld the Heavens." Rays or feathe rs
encircle his head, and the se
terminate in beautifully designed miniature heads of the
jaguar, the symbol of the Night or Moon-god. On eithe r
side the chief deity is flanked by
forty-eight othe r figures,
twenty-four to a side, all facing the
god and depicted as running towards him. In all probability the se were symbolic of the
god's supreme power and the hom age paid to him by the
lesser deities. Beneath the throne
on which the god himself is seated
is a row of sixteen carved figures showing small replicas of the god's head, as well as the
heads of condors, separated by ornamental designs.
The opposite side of the portal, though wholly different, is even more
remarkable. Here, the surface of the stone is bare of ornamental bas-relief carvings,
but is decorated with a severe geom etrical
design. On the upper portion, at the opposite ends of the
gateway, are four rectangular niches, two to a side, and on the lower portion the re
is a rectangular niche on eithe r
side of the doorway. These niches,
which are cut into the hard rock to
a depth of nearly
six inches, togethe r with the ir ornamental frames or borders, are so
accurately cut and so mathe matically perfect that even by means of a steel square
and a millimeter scale I could not find a deviation of more than one-fiftieth of
an inch in the ir angles or surfaces.
This is perhaps the most astonishing
feature of the Tiahuanaco
stone work. At the Tunca-Puncu ruins,
nearly a mile southwest of the
temple, such geom etrically and mathe matically cut squares, rectangles and crosses are
abundant. Often the y are carried
into the rock in a series of concentric
steps to a depth of a foot or more, the
final, deepest niche being only two or three inches square. In places, too, the re
are cross or key-shaped sculptures in high relief which obviously fitted into recesses
of the same forms, thus locking the stone togethe r,
and the most painstaking
measurements prove that the greatest
variation in size between the se
recesses and the projecting crosses
is less than a millimeter! How any human beings could have performed such
amazingly accurate work in a hard refractory rock with only stone tools is a
mystery that no one has been able to explain.
Even today, our most skilled
stone-cutters, equipped with steel tools and machinery, would find it a
difficult undertaking to duplicate the
feat, and yet, as far as known, the
ancient Tiahuánacans had no knowledge of steel, and no bronze or copper
implement has ever been found that will make the
least impression on the rock.
But regardless of how the y did it, the
ancient inhabitants of Tiahuanaco accom plished it, and, judging from
the remains, did not find it a very
difficult undertaking at that. To many, however, the
immense masses of cut stone upon the
low mound of Tunca-Puncu are more remarkable than the
sculptures. Originally the mound,
like the Akapana, was faced
with stone, and immense stone steps led from
the plain to the
summit where the re was a stupendous
stone building the exact purpose of
which is unknown. But, unlike Akapana, the
stones that surfaced the Tunca-Puncu
mound were of colossal size, while the
structure that surmounted it was built of stone slabs that are far larger than
any othe rs known in prehistoric
architecture.
Som e
of the se are estimated to weigh over
two hundred tons each, while slabs weighing sixty to one hundred tons are
abundant, and all are as accurately and smoothly cut, trued and squared as
though cut and planed on som e
gigantic machine.
Several of the largest of the se
immense slabs formed huge platforms or floors, and about the ir
edges are numerous niches or recesses cut into the
rock. Originally, the se probably
served as resting places for idols or statues. Although called the "Place of the
Ten Doors" yet the re is little
evidence to show that the structure
ever had ten doors. Far more probably the re
were no doors whatever, the building
being more in the nature of an open
colonnade with columns supporting sculptured lintels.
It was probably roofless, for
in many places the re are basin-like
hollows and drains cut into the
rock, with gutters evidently designed to carry off water that fell within the structure. With the
place in the regrettably ruinous
state it is in today it is difficult to say what it was like originally or what
purpose it served. But that the
stones were not cemented togethe r,
but were locked or keyed in place by immense metal staples is evident.
Everywhere about the edges of the mammoth blocks of stone are T-shaped recesses
cut deeply into the rock, and som etimes with a perforation extending entirely
through the slab. In places, two of the se mortises still remain in line so that it is
easy to see how the metal staples
held the two slabs togethe r.
It has been assumed by many
that the se staples were of copper,
but last year an employee of the
railway discovered one of the m
intact, and, instead of being of copper, it proved to be of solid silver. This
is not, however, surprising. Silver is abundant in Bolivia, it was widely used
by all the ancient races, and as it
had no intrinsic value to the m and
was far stiffer and stronger than copper it was far more suitable for locking the great stones in position. And the fact that the
staples were of silver explains in great measure why the
massive structure collapsed. To the
Spaniards, copper would have meant little —it was far too worthless to pay for the time and trouble necessary to tear the staples from
the stones. But silver was a
different matter. Each of the great
staples weighed many pounds; the re
were hundreds, perhaps thousands of the m,
and the rapacious Dons wrenched and
pried the m loose, thus allowing the massive stones to fall apart and tumble to the earth. Possibly, very probably, many of the silver staples still remain in the lower portions of the
stones, buried beneath the mammoth
slabs, but even with modern devices and steam power it would cost far more to
move one of the masses of cut stone
than the metal would be worth, even
though the re were hundreds of the m.
Where the
Tiahuánacans secured the stone the y used, or how the y
transported it, have always been mysteries. No similar stone exists within six
miles of the city, and it would
appear to have been an Herculean, an impossible task to have dragged the se blocks, weighing one hundred to two hundred
tons, across the sandy plain. And the the ory
that the y might have been brought on
rafts across the lake is even more
improbable.
The problem has been the more perplexing because it has always been held
that no ancient American race ever discovered the
wheel. But last year, while carrying on investigations at Tiahuánaco, I
discovered two immense stone disks that might well have served as wheels. Both
of the se were at Tunca-Puncu. One
was concealed beneath a fallen mass of stone, the
othe r was partly covered with a
fragment of a slab and was deeply embedded in the
earth. They were approximately seven feet in diameter by eighteen inches in
thickness, and were pierced with square holes in the
centers. At first sight the y might
have been mistaken for Spanish mill-wheels, or arastras, but as far as
known no Spanish mill ever was situated near the
spot, and the re is no reason why one
ever should have been the re.
Moreover, the y differed materially
from any mill-wheels I have ever
seen, and the y were of the same stone and the
same class of workmanship as the
structure itself.
With such wheels, fitted to a
fixed axle, it would have been a fairly simple matter to have transported the blocks of stones from
the hills to the
site of the city. Their width would
have prevented the m from sinking deeply into the
sandy soil, and, by slinging the
stone beneath the axle by means of
ropes, the y could have been dragged
along by man power. Having no wood of any size the
Tiahuánacans would have been forced to use stone wheels if the y used any. As a stone wheel, rotating upon a
wooden axle, would have ground through the
latter in no time, it would have been quite natural to fit a fixed axle with
squared ends, and allow this to rotate in a greased sling. Perhaps the se great stone disks were never used as wheels.
Perhaps the y belonged to a later
epoch than the Tiahuánacans. But
personally I believe the y were
wheels, and that the y were used in
transporting the immense stones. Who
can say? Who will ever know?
Of the
inhabitants of this oldest American city we know little. Although many skulls
and skeletons have been found in and about Tiahuanaco ,
it is doubtful if any are those of the
builders or the original denizens of
the city. More probably the y are the
remains of the later pre-Incas and
Incans, for we know that the se races
occupied the district for many
years. At all events, all the
skeletal remains thus far discovered are not different, anatom ically, from
those of the living Indians of
Bolivia.
However, that the Tiahuánacans were a highly cultured and
civilized people, and that the ir
arts and industries were not confined to the
erection of stupendous buildings and to amazing sculptures, is proved by the pottery, the
metal work and the othe r artifacts that have been obtained from the
site. In the ir ceramic ware the Tiahuánacans had few equals and no superiors
among the prehistoric races of South
America, and throughout Peru, Bolivia and even in Chile, one finds pottery,
textiles, carvings and othe r objects
showing the strong influence of the Tiahuanaco art and culture.
Not only was the ir pottery beautifully modeled and magnificently
decorated with painted designs, but in addition, the y
were past-masters in the plastic
art, and modeled most lifelike and accurate figures of men, birds, reptiles,
beasts, gods and inanimate objects. Many of the ir
jars are of the effigy type, othe rs are of the
portrait type, and the features, the expressions, the
very characters of the individuals
depicted are truly marvelous. Often, too, the y
modeled large, life-sized hollow images, som e
apparently representing gods, othe rs
heroes, othe rs monarchs and
individuals. And from the se and the ir
portrait jars we can obtain a very good and no doubt accurate idea of the personal appearance, the
costumes and the habits of the people. Judged thus, the
Tiahuánacans were obviously of the
so-called Indian race.
Though Tiahuánaco may be
shrouded in mystery, though we may know nothing of its origin or its past,
though no one can decipher the
sculptures and the hieroglyphs that
decorate much of the pottery, though
even the Incas and the ir predecessors knew so little of the ancient race that the y
referred to the city merely as the "Place of the
Dead," yet we may be sure that the
oldest of American cities was built and occupied by real Americans.
No comments:
Post a Comment